英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
65580查看　65580　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
65580查看　65580　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
65580查看　65580　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • MEDINA LARA v. HOLDER (2014) | FindLaw
    Case opinion for US 9th Circuit MEDINA LARA v HOLDER Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw
  • UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    By contrast, Medina notes that § 12022(c) simply incorporates by reference the definition of firearm appearing at former § 12001(b), and that there are a good many cases in which California obtained a conviction based on that definition in which the firearm in question was antique
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder
    The panel also held that the Board incorrectly concluded that Medina’s firearm offense was a predicate for removal because at the time of Medina’s conviction the term “firearm” under CPC §12022 (c) was defined by former CPC §12001 (b), which was overbroad and did not distinguish antique firearms
  • Jose Medina-Lara v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 771 F. 3d 1106
    Medina-Lara, a Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident, faces removal after 2005 and 2007 California drug convictions The 2005 §11351 conviction included a firearm enhancement under California law (§12022 (c))
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder - Law. com
    The IJ further found that §12022 was categorically a firearm offense under the INA, and thus ordered Medina removed on that ground as well The IJ did not address the §11377 conviction
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder
    Jose Medina-Lara petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision authorizing his removal to Mexico, after his California state conviction of an aggravated felony, controlled substance offense, and firearm offense
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder | No. 13–70491. | 9th Cir. - CaseMine
    The government argues that there is only a “theoretical possibility” and not a “realistic probability” that California would prosecute an individual under § 12022 (c) where the firearm in question was antique
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder, 09 19 2014, 13-70491 - FindLaw
    Petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision finding petitioner removable for his California state conviction is granted, and the removal order vacated, where: 1) the government did not carry its burden to establish that petitioner's conviction was an aggravated felony or controlled substance offense, and thus petitioner's California Health Safety Code (CHS) section 11351 conviction was neither an aggravated felony nor a controlled substance offense under the Immigration and Nationality Act; 2) petitioner's CHS section 11351 conviction for carrying a firearm in violation of California Penal Code section 12022 (c) did not constitute a categorical firearm offense; and 3) the government was precluded from relitigating the issue of whether petitioner was removable for his conviction of a second controlled substance conviction under CHS section 11377
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder (Medina-Lara v. Holder, 767 F. 3d 801 (9th . . . - vLex
    Medina-Lara v Holder (Medina-Lara v Holder, 767 F 3d 801 (9th Cir 2014)), filed at U S Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
  • Medina-Lara v. Holder | No. 13–70491. | 9th Cir. - CaseMine
    Having framed the inquiry correctly, Medina's challenge easily passes the Duenas–Alvarez bar California obviously prosecutes individuals for firearm crimes arising under the former § 12001 (b) definition even when the firearm in question is antique





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009