英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

leontine    音标拼音: [lɛnt'ini] [l'iɑnt'ɑɪn]
牡丹草亭

牡丹草亭


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
Leontine查看　Leontine　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
Leontine查看　Leontine　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
Leontine查看　Leontine　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Bug: HTTP 400 The final block in an assistant message cannot be . . .
    This looks like a backend message formatting bug in how Google wraps or passes the thinking block to the Claude API It should be a quick fix on your side (just ensure the final block of any assistant message is never thinking)
  • [claude] 400 final block in an assistant message cannot be thinking . . .
    It shows up only when the assistant turn that called compress also had a thinking block before the tool call, i e [thinking, tool_use:mcp__bili__compress] My guess is that bili drops the executed compress tool_use (and its result) from the forwarded history but keeps the thinking block, so that assistant message ends with thinking
  • 400 on resuming a long session: thinking blocks in the latest assistant . . .
    My best guess is that core's compaction pass (the thing behind session_before_compact) re-emits that final turn's thinking blocks non-identically on resume, which is what the API is objecting to I've put the ruled-out suspects and evidence in a clearly AI-labelled comment below so this stays short Steps to reproduce
  • Bug: Trajectory permanently poisoned by thinking-terminated assistant . . .
    Bug: HTTP 400 “The final block in an assistant message cannot be thinking” — Claude models fail every time thinking ends (Apr 18, 2026) — same root cause, additional trace IDs
  • Expected `thinking` or `redacted_thinking`, but found `text`
    When `thinking` is enabled, a final `assistant` message must start with a thinking block (preceeding the lastmost set of `tool_use` and `tool_result` blocks) We recommend you include thinking blocks from previous turns To avoid this requirement, disable `thinking`
  • Troubleshooting thinking - Claude Platform Docs
    This error occurs when the assistant message you send back differs from the one the API returned, most often because your code filters content blocks by type and drops redacted_thinking blocks, or rebuilds the assistant message instead of echoing it
  • Extended thinking - Amazon Bedrock
    Preserving thinking blocks: During tool use, you must pass thinking blocks back to the API for the last assistant message Include the complete unmodified block back to the API to maintain reasoning continuity
  • Claude Code invalid signature in thinking block Fix
    Thinking blocks carry a cryptographic signature, and the API checks that the thinking blocks you send back are unchanged from the original response When a bug in how Claude Code rebuilds the history makes a block differ from the original, the API rejects it
  • Extended thinking - Claude Platform Docs
    Manual mode adds one requirement: the final assistant turn of a thinking-enabled request must start with a thinking block (adaptive thinking drops that requirement)
  • Thinking Reasoning Content | liteLLM
    LiteLLM's completion () API does support sending thinking_blocks in assistant messages If you're using LiteLLM directly (not through an OpenAI-compatible client), you can preserve and resend thinking_blocks and everything will work correctly





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009