英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
etymologer查看　etymologer　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
etymologer查看　etymologer　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
etymologer查看　etymologer　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • UFDs are integrally closed; so too are GCD Dedekind domains.
    Proof that UFDs are Integrally Closed Firstly, localizations of UFDs are UFDs while intersections of integrally closed domains in the field of fractions of A are integrally closed Recalling that A = ⋂p ∈ SpecAAp, we may assume A is local
  • UFD’s are integrally closed - PlanetMath. org
    Theorem: Every UFD is integrally closed Proof: Let R R be a UFD, K K its field of fractions, u∈ K,u u ∈ K, u integral over R R Then for some c0,…,cn−1 ∈R c 0, …, c n - 1 ∈ R, Write u= a b,a,b∈ R u = a b, a, b ∈ R, where a,b a, b have no non-unit common divisor (which we can assume since R R is a UFD) Multiply the above equation by bn b n to get
  • Unique Factorization Domain is Integrally Closed - ProofWiki
    Let $A$ be a unique factorization domain (UFD) Then $A$ is integrally closed Proof Let $K$ be the field of quotients of $A$ Let $x \in K$ be integral over $A$ Let: $x = a b$ for $a, b \in A$ with $\gcd \set {a, b} \in A^\times$ This makes sense because a UFD is GCD Domain There is an equation:
  • What is the relationship between being normal and being regular?
    Actually Auslander and Buchsbaum proved in 1959 that a regular local ring is a UFD and it is an easy result that a UFD (local or not) is integrally closed Serre then gave a completely different proof
  • 1. Properties of UFDs and affine domains - Mathematics and Statistics
    Proposition 2 3 A valuation ring is integrally closed Proof Let R be a valuation ring and x 2K = Q(R) Then there exists an integral dependence relation: xn + a n 1x n 1 + + a 1x+ a 0 = 0; where a i 2R Assume that x =2R Then x 1 2R and more precisely x 1 2m, otherwise x itself is in R Since x 6= 0 we can divide by it Then 1 = (a n 1x 1
  • Proof: A K 2 A 2 Anf g 2 - University of Michigan
    And k[t] is a UFD, hence integrally closed by the rst problem Thus k[t] is the normalization of A 0 ; that is, the normalization of A 0 is obtained by adjoining the element t 3 =t 2 to A 0 inside its eld of fractions
  • Integrally Closed but not UFD - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    We know that UFDs are integrally closed But there is no theorem which states that Integrally Closed are UFD So I wonder there should be a counter-example I know that $Z[\sqrt{4k+2}$ and $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{4k+3}$ are integrally closed I wonder which of them is not a UFD
  • unique factorization domain in nLab - ncatlab. org
    As noted above, a UFD is necessarily integrally closed The lattice of principal ideals under the inclusion order is a distributive lattice There is a useful characterization of UFDs by Irving Kaplansky :
  • Integral Extensions, Integrally Closed - MathReference
    Every ufd is integrally closed For example, the integers are closed in the rationals If two extensions of R are integrally closed, their composition need not be Adjoin the square root of -1, or the square root of 2, to the integers Either extension alone is integrally closed
  • Math 210B. Quadratic integer rings Computing the integral closure of Z . . .
    We saw in class that if Ais an integrally closed domain with fraction eld F and F0=F is a nite separable extension in which the integral closure of Ais denoted A 0 then Tr F 0 =F carries A





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009