英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

geocentric    音标拼音: [dʒ,ios'ɛntrɪk]
a. 以地球为中心的

以地球为中心的

geocentric
adj 1: having the earth as the center [ant: {heliocentric}]


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
geocentric查看　geocentric　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
geocentric查看　geocentric　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
geocentric查看　geocentric　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Stern v. Marshall, 564 U. S. 462 (2011) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
    The Court held, however, that the Bankruptcy Court lacked the constitutional authority under Article III to enter final judgment on a state law counterclaim that was not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor's proof claim Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals was affirmed
  • STERN v. MARSHALL - LII Legal Information Institute
    We need not determine what constitutes a “personal injury tort” in this case because we agree with Vickie that §157 (b) (5) is not jurisdictional, and that Pierce consented to the Bankruptcy Court’s resolution of his defamation claim 4 Because “ [b]randing a rule as going to a court’s subject-matter jurisdiction alters the normal
  • U. S. Reports: Stern v. Marshall, 564 U. S. 462 (2011).
    A full majority of the Court, while not agreeing on the scope of that excep tion, concluded that the doctrine did not encompass adjudication of the state law claim at issue in that case, and rejected the debtor’s argument that the Bankruptcy Court’s exercise of jurisdiction was constitutional because the bankruptcy judge was acting merely
  • Stern v. Marshall - Wikipedia
    Stern v Marshall, 564 U S 462 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a bankruptcy court, as a non-Article III court (i e , courts without full judicial independence) lacked constitutional authority under Article III of the United States Constitution to enter a final judgment on a state law counterclaim that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a
  • Stern v. Marshall – bankruptcy court jurisdiction: cut to the core
    The U S Supreme Court, in the case of Stern v Marshall, ruled (in a 5-4 vote) on June 23, 2011 that a bankruptcy court judge did not have the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment
  • Stern v. Marshall: Limits on Bankruptcy Court Authority
    The 2011 Supreme Court decision Stern v Marshall, 564 U S 462 (2011), redrew the jurisdictional map for federal bankruptcy courts, holding that Article I bankruptcy judges lack constitutional authority to enter final judgment on certain state-law counterclaims — even when those claims arise in a properly filed bankruptcy case This page examines the ruling's definitional scope, its
  • Stern v. Marshall (10-179) | SCOTUSblog
    The bankruptcy court had the statutory authority to issue a final and binding decision on a claim based exclusively on a right assured by state law However, the bankruptcy court nonetheless lacked t…
  • Stern v. Marshall - Shaking Bankruptcy Jurisdiction to Its Core . . .
    In Stern v Marshall, 131 S Ct 2594 (2011), the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, a k a Anna Nicole Smith, lost by a 5-4 margin Round 2 of its Supreme Court bout with the estate of E Pierce Marshall in a contest over Vickie's rights to a portion of the fortune of her late husband, billionaire J Howard Marshall II The dollar figures in dispute, amounting to more than $400 million, and the
  • Stern v. Marshall – Case Brief Summary – Facts, Issue, Holding . . .
    United States Supreme Court: The bankruptcy court cannot exercise jurisdiction over adverse claims to property not in the possession of the bankruptcy estate without the consent of the claimants
  • Supreme Court Limits Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction - Stern v. Marshall
    In a decision that may create serious problems for bankruptcy case administration, the Supreme Court this morning invalidated part of the Bankruptcy Court jurisdictional scheme Stern v Marshall
  • Stern v. Marshall, 06 23 2011, 10–179 - US Supreme Court | FindLaw
    In a dispute involving the scope of 28 U S C section 157, judgment of the appeals court reversing entry of final judgment on a tort counterclaim in a bankruptcy proceeding is affirmed where although the bankruptcy court had the statutory authority to enter judgment as a core proceeding, it lacked the constitutional authority to do so Appellate Information Decided 06 23 2011 Published 06 23





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009